Files
mg4/OTA.md
T
2026-09-29 17:04:59 +03:00

163 lines
8.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Publishing an OTA release
How to ship an update the car will install by itself. Written for whoever does this
next — probably me, having forgotten the details.
## First upgrade from 2.2.3 or older
Install the platform-signed 2.2.7 APK manually once if the car still runs 2.2.3 or older.
Those builds use the old `pm install` path; publishing a newer APK does not repair the
installer already running on the car. Builds from 2.2.4 use `PackageInstaller` sessions.
Keep the unstable package ID, system shared UID and signing certificate when upgrading.
The 2.2.5 build removes window automation. It also distinguishes failed release checks
from a successful check with no newer release. On 2026-09-29, GitHub still published only
2.2.3 at the last live check. The local 2.2.7 build includes these fixes and the redesigned
UI; it becomes available to OTA only after publication as a pre-release asset named
`FatihsMG4-unstable-2.2.7.apk`, together with
`FatihsMG4-unstable-2.2.7.apk.sha256`.
The vehicle artifact uses `com.evsuite.abrp.unstable`, `android.uid.system`, and the
DriveHub_Kamera platform key. Its certificate SHA-256 must be
`c8a2e9bccf597c2fb6dc66bee293fc13f2fc47ec77bc6b2b0d52c11f51192ab8`.
The stable build used for a Samsung UI preview is a separate package without OTA or the
vehicle's shared UID; do not use that preview APK for the MG4 upgrade.
## What the updater actually looks for
`OtaUpdater.check()` reads `https://api.github.com/repos/fatihdonmezdev/MG4ABRP/releases`
and walks **every** entry, keeping the highest version rather than the first match. A
release is a candidate only if all of these hold:
| Requirement | Where it is enforced | What happens otherwise |
|---|---|---|
| Marked **pre-release** | `release.optBoolean("prerelease")` | Skipped entirely |
| Asset name contains `unstable` | `name.contains("unstable")` | Asset ignored |
| Asset name ends `-<version>.apk` | `ASSET_VERSION` regex | No version, asset ignored |
| Version strictly higher than installed | `isNewer()` | Nothing to do, reports "Güncel" |
| Download host on the allowlist | `isAllowedUrl()` | Refused and logged |
| APK signed with the **same certificate** as the running app | `signatureMatchesRunningApp()` | Deleted, never installed |
| Matching `.sha256` asset or `SHA256SUMS` entry | `fetchExpectedSha256()` | Update ignored/refused |
The last one is the one that bites. The car runs a platform-signed build; an APK signed
with a debug key — or anyone else's key — is downloaded, rejected and deleted. Sign every
release with the same platform key or the update silently never lands.
The version comes from the **asset filename**, not the git tag. The tag can stay
`unstable` forever and be moved; the filename is what identifies a build.
## Release checklist
1. **Raise the version.** `app/build.gradle`, `defaultConfig`:
```gradle
versionCode 24 // must increase — Android orders updates by this, not by name
versionName "2.2.7"
```
The unstable flavour appends its own suffix, so `2.2.7` becomes `2.2.7.0-unstable`.
Check what the installed build reports before picking a number: the app's About
dialog shows it, and `isNewer` compares numerically segment by segment.
2. **Build.**
```bash
./gradlew :app:assembleUnstableDebug
```
3. **Sign with the platform key.** Options come *before* the input APK — apksigner
rejects the other order.
```bash
BT=~/Android/Sdk/build-tools/35.0.0
KEYS=~/Desktop/Coding/MG/DriveHub_Kamera/tools
"$BT/zipalign" -f 4 \
app/build/outputs/apk/unstable/debug/app-unstable-debug.apk aligned.apk
"$BT/apksigner" sign \
--key "$KEYS/platform.pk8" \
--cert "$KEYS/platform.x509.pem" \
--out FatihsMG4-unstable-2.2.7.apk \
aligned.apk
rm aligned.apk
```
The output filename **is** the version the updater reads. Name it
`FatihsMG4-unstable-<version>.apk`, then create its required integrity sidecar:
```bash
shasum -a 256 FatihsMG4-unstable-2.2.7.apk \
> FatihsMG4-unstable-2.2.7.apk.sha256
```
4. **Verify the signer** before uploading. It must say `CN=Android`:
```bash
"$BT/apksigner" verify --print-certs FatihsMG4-unstable-2.2.7.apk
```
5. **Publish.** On github.com/fatihdonmezdev/MG4ABRP → Releases → Draft a new release:
- tag: `unstable` (reuse it; the rolling tag is the design)
- **tick "Set as a pre-release"** ← the whole thing is inert without this
- attach the signed APK and its `.sha256` sidecar
6. **Install it.** Open the app on the head unit and press the refresh button in the top
bar. The dialog shows download progress, verifies SHA-256, then reports that the
PackageInstaller session has started.
## When it says something else
| Toast | Meaning |
|---|---|
| `Güncel (2.2.2.0-unstable)` | No release beat the installed version. Check the pre-release tick and the asset filename. |
| `Güncelleme reddedildi: SHA-256 doğrulaması yok` | APK has no matching sidecar, or the sidecar is invalid/unreachable. |
| `İndirme veya SHA-256 doğrulaması başarısız` | Download failed or its bytes do not match the published hash. |
| `Kuruluyor: 2.2.3 — ekrandaki onayı bekleyin` | The session was committed. Not done yet: watch for the platform's own toast, or a confirmation dialog to accept. |
| `Kurulum reddedildi: imza uyuşmuyor` | Genuinely the wrong key — rebuild and re-sign with `platform.pk8`. Unlike the old catch-all, this one means what it says. |
| `Kurulum reddedildi: APK okunamadı` | The archive does not parse, or it is built for another package. |
| `Kurulum başlatılamadı … Log sayfasına bakın` | The session could not be created or committed. `adb logcat -s EVABRP.Update`. |
| `Kurulum başarısız: INSTALL_FAILED_…` | From `OtaInstallResultReceiver` — the package manager's own words for why it refused. |
| `Güncelleme kontrolü başarısız` | The check threw. `adb logcat -s EVABRP.Update OtaUpdater` if a cable is available; otherwise the in-app Log page. |
## How the install works, and why it is not `pm install`
`OtaUpdater.install()` used to shell out to `/system/bin/pm install -r`. On this head unit
that fails every time, and the reason is worth writing down because the symptom pointed
somewhere else entirely.
The downloaded APK lives in `context.getCacheDir()`. `pm` does not install the file itself
— it passes the path to the package manager service, which opens it from *its* process and
SELinux context, where an app's private cache is not readable. The install failed, and
because `install()` returned a bare boolean, the caller reported the only failure it knew
how to name: `Kurulum reddedildi (imza uyuşmuyor?)`. A correctly signed build, refused with
a signature error it had not earned. The `pm` output that would have said so was captured
and thrown away.
It now uses the platform `PackageInstaller`: we open the archive ourselves and stream it
into a session, so no second process ever has to read our cache. The approach is taken from
[merthankaraman/DriveHub_Dort](https://github.com/merthankaraman/DriveHub_Dort), which hit
the same wall on the same hardware.
Two consequences for anyone reading a failure:
- **Committing a session is not installing.** `commit()` is asynchronous. The refresh button
can only report that an install *started*; the verdict arrives at
`OtaInstallResultReceiver` and appears as its own toast.
- **`STATUS_PENDING_USER_ACTION` is not an error.** The platform is asking the driver to
confirm. The receiver launches the confirmation activity the platform hands it.
Still unverified on the car: whether this build installs silently or raises that
confirmation. Either way it installs, which the old path did not.
## Why installation is manual
`UpdateHook.checkInBackground(this)` performs an availability-only check at app start and
shows a notification toast when a complete APK + hash pair exists. It never downloads or
installs. The refresh button is the only trigger for download, verification and installation.
The upload service does **not** check for updates on its tick. Installing a new APK
restarts the process, and doing that mid-drive would interrupt the telemetry the service
exists to send.